Satish Nagnath Shinde v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Chief Secretary And Others

7392.22wp (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 911 WRIT PETITION NO.7392 OF 2022 SATISH NAGNATH SHINDE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND OTHERS ....

Mr J. M. Murkute, Advocate for petitioner;

Mr S. B. Yawalkar, A.G.P. for respondents/State Mr A. B. Kadethankar, Standing Counsel for respondent No.2 CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.

DATE : 20th July, 2022 PER COURT:

1.

The petitioner has put forth prayer clause (C), which reads as under :- "C) The respondents may kindly be directed to consider the objection filed by the petitioner and complete the process of Ward Formation taking into consideration Geographical Proximity with the assistance of City Survey Office and Assistant Town Planning Office, Beed."

2.

The learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that he has gone through the view taken by this Court vide Judgment dated 05/07/2022, in Writ Petition No.6765/2022, filed by Anant Baburao Golait (Gahilot) Vs. State Election Commission of

7392.22wp (2) Maharashtra and others, with a group of matters. 3.

The learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner desires to approach the concerned authority and request the said authority to decide the representation, which the petitioner contemplates to file. He prays for disposal of this petition so as to approach the concerned authorities. 4.

In view of the above, this petition is disposed off. Since the petitioner desires to approach the authorities by filing a representation, we find no reason to express any view thereon. (ANIL L. PANSARE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) sjk