Sheela Sarsu Hanumante And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7617 OF 2013 SHEELA SARSU HANUMANTE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Gunale Prakash G. AGP for Respondents State: Mrs. S. A. Dhumal Advocate for Respondents 4 and 5: Mr. V. S.Panpatte Advocate for Respondents 6 & 7: Mr. V. D. Gunale ...

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & V. K. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE :

7th August, 2015 PER COURT :

1.

Mr. Gunale, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that now petitioners 1, 2 and 3 are absorbed vide subsequent order. Petitioners 2 and 3 are already paid necessary increments. However, petitioner No.1 is not given benefit of the same. The petitioners 4 and 5 did not want to be absorbed in any other institution. In the light of that now the dispute that would remain is regarding increment of petitioner No. 1 which is not paid as contended by the petitioner No.1. and the completion of service book. 2.

The respondent Management shall give the necessary increment to the petitioner No. 1 as is permissible and admissible in law. The same shall be done within six months.

3.

The respondent management shall also complete the service book of petitioner No.1. Petitioner No.1 shall also cooperate in completion of the said service book. The same to be done simultaneously within six months from today. 4.

Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. (V. K. JADHAV, J.) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) JPC 1/1