Beed Jilha Us Tod Kamgar Vikas Mandal Through Its President U M Karad v. Jagdish P Gupta And Another

( 1 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.185 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8485 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8560 OF 2019 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.185 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8485 OF 2017 Beed Jilha Us-Tod Kamgar Mandal, Through its President, Uddhav S/o Maroti Karad, Age 45 years, Occu.Service Sane Guruji Residential School, Kaij,Tq.Kaij,Dist.Beed PETITIONER

VERSUS

1.

Mr. Jagdish P. Gupta Principal Secretary, Social Justice & Special Assistance Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 2.

Mr Sharad Ahire Director, V.J.N.T., O.B.C., & S.B.C.

Welfare, Maharashtra State, Pune.

RESPONDENTS Mr Sachin S. Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner; Mr K.S. Patil, A.G.P. for respondents

( 2 ) CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.

DATED :

19th SEPTEMBER, 2019 ORAL ORDER:

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner.

2.

On a grievance that the order of this Court where by the respondent authority was directed to decide the proposal for grant of Ashram School is not complied with, present petition was filed.

3.

Simple notice was issued by this Court vide order dated 6th March, 2019 to respondent No.2. In response to the said notice, an affidavit-in-reply is filed on behalf of respondent No.2 - Sharad Laxman Ahire, working as director, VJNT, OBC and SBC Welfare Department, Maharashtra State, Pune. Alongwith the affidavit-in-reply order of the State Government dated 21st August, 2019 is annexed as Annexure - R-1.

( 3 ) 4.

Perusal of the said order shows that the proposal for grant of Ashram School to the petitioner institute is turned down.

5.

As the order of this Court is now complied with, nothing survives in the petition. Accordingly, same is disposed of.

6.

Needless to state that, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the order passed by State Government, where in the proposal is turned down, the petitioner may avail appropriate remedies in challenge to the order if so advised. With this liberty, contempt petition is disposed of.

7.

As the contempt petition itself is disposed of, no order is required to be passed in civil application. Accordingly, civil application is disposed of. [AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.] [PRASANNA B. VARALE,J.] Tupe