← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7813/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Bhaktraj Dnyandev Funde v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2018-07-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil K. Kotwal3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 12 WRIT PETITION NO. 7813 OF 2018 BHAKTRAJ DNYANDEV FUNDE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH 13 WRIT PETITION NO. 7814 OF 2018 KIRAN SHANKAR GAIKWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH 14 WRIT PETITION NO. 7815 OF 2018 SEEMA MACHHINDRA SHIRWAT

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH 15 WRIT PETITION NO. 7816 OF 2018 ROHINI SURESH DEHADRAY

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH 16 WRIT PETITION NO. 7817 OF 2018 SUNITA BABASAHEB KARAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

wp7813.18 ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Kshirsagar Gajanan K. AGP for Respondents 1 and 2 : Mr. A.V.Deshmukh Adv. For respondent nos. 3 and 4 : Mr. S.B.Ghute ...

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND SUNIL K.KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : JULY 17, 2018 O R D E R :

Issue notice to the respondents.

2.

Learned AGP waives service of notice for respondent nos. 1 and 2.

3.

Mr. Ghute, learned counsel waives service of notice for respondent nos. 3 and 4.

4.

Mr. Kshirsagar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners at present are seeking only limited relief that the Chief Executive Officer be directed to decide the representation filed by the petitioners with regard

wp7813.18 to the couple convenience.

5.

We have heard learned counsel Mr. Ghute for respondent nos. 3 and 4.

6.

As the only limited relief is sought, we are not going into the merits of the matter.

7.

Respondent no.

may decide the representation filed by the petitioners, as permissible in law and policy within three months from today.

8.

The writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

[SUNIL K.KOTWAL, J.] [S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.] mahajansb/