Chanbas Shankar Mali v. Executive Engineer, Irrigation Project, Majbutikaran, Division Omerga, Now Osmanabad And Others
2025:BHC-AUG:19446 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7562 OF 2025 IN FAST/20675/2021 JILANI ISMAIL SHAIKH
VERSUS
EX. ENGINEER, IRRIGATION PROJECT MAJBUTIKARAN DIV. OMERGA AND OTHERS ......
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Manoj Dharmaraj Shinde Advocate for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. R. K. Ingole AGP for Respondents - State : Mr. N. D. Batule ......
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7563 OF 2025 IN FAST/20120/2021 CHANBAS SHANKAR MALI
VERSUS
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION PROJECT, MAJBUTIKARAN, DIVISION OMERGA, NOW OSMANABAD AND OTHERS ......
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Manoj Dharmaraj Shinde Advocate for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. R. K. Ingole AGP for Respondent - State : Mr. N. D. Batule ......
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7564 OF 2025 IN FAST/20663/2021 POMA UMAJI JADHAV
VERSUS
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION PROJECT MAJBUTIKARAN, DIVISION OMERGA, NOW OSMANABAD AND OTHERS ......
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Manoj Dharmaraj Shinde Advocate for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. R. K. Ingole AGP for Respondent - State : Mr. N. D. Batule ......
-2WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7565 OF 2025 IN FAST/20666/2021 BHASKAR SHIVRAM SURYAWANSHI
VERSUS
EX. ENGINEER, IRRIGATION PROJECT MAJBUTIKARAN DIV. OMERGA AND OTHERS ......
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Manoj Dharmaraj Shinde Advocate for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. R. K. Ingole AGP for Respondent - State: Mr. N. D. Batule ......
CORAM :
ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.
DATED :
24 JULY 2025 PER COURT :- 1.
Learned counsel for applicants submits that, there is one alphabet missing in one of the claimant's name. He seeks permission to rectify the same. Permission is granted.
2.
Heard rival submissions.
3.
The respective applicants in all these Applications are seeking withdrawal of the entire amount of compensation, which has been deposited by the acquiring body along with the interest accrued thereon. It appears that, the acquiring body has deposited entire amount of the impugned award.
-34.
The learned counsel for the acquiring body opposed the application for withdrawal of amount.
5.
For the reasons stated in the application, the applicants herein are permitted to withdraw 75% of the amount with accrued interest thereon on furnishing usual undertaking to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.
6.
The Civil Applications are accordingly disposed off. [ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.] Tandale