Pandurang Jagannathji Kale v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

wp7081.15.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7081 OF 2015 Mr. Pandurang s/o Jagannathji Kale .. PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. P.N. Kalani, advocate for petitioner.

Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for the State.

===== CORAM : R.M. BORDE & P. R. BORA, JJ.

DATE : 20th JULY, 2015 PER COURT :

1.

It is not disputed that there are disputes pending between the owner of the property and the petitioner who claims to be in possession. In view of pendency of dispute, the grievance raised by petitioner in the instant petition need not be entertained in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It would be open for the petitioner to avail remedies available in law. Keeping the aforesaid option open for the petitioner, writ petition stands rejected. 2.

Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of.

( P. R. BORA ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb