← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6301/2024disposed off

Suman Bajirao Agale And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Chief Secretary And Others

2024-06-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:12384

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6301 OF 2024 SUMAN BAJIRAO AGALE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND OTHERS Mr. G. J. Pahilwan, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, AGP for the respondent/State Mr. W. S. Jadhav, Advocate for respondent Nos. 6 and 7. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 27th JUNE, 2024 PER COURT :- 1.

Mr. Jadhav, learned counsel states that he has instructions to appear on behalf of respondent Nos. 6 and 7.

2.

This petition takes exception to the issuance of notice by the Revenue Authorities for the purpose of execution of decree of partition. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners though were parties to the original proceedings, are not issued with notice in the execution. Thus, it is his contention that in utter disregard of the principles of natural justice the execution proceedings are being conducted and hence, it is a fit case to stay the impugned notice.

903.wp6301.24.odt

4.

Learned counsel for the respondents pointed out that there was a decree pursuant to the compromise between the plaintiffs and defendants whereby present petitioners had relinquished their right in the suit property.

5.

As such, there is no substance in the challenge to the notice. Hence, petition stands dismissed.

(R. M. JOSHI, J.) ssp 903.wp6301.24.odt