Sujata Navanath Gadekar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

(1) W.P. No. 6762 of 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

Writ Petition No. 6762 of 2015 Sujata d/o. Navanath Gadkar, Age : 24 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Tugaon, Taluka : Osmanabad, District : Osmanabad.

.. Petitioner.

versus

1. The State of Maharashtra, Through Director of Sports and Youth Services, Central Building, Pune, District : Pune.

2. The Maharashtra Tug-Of-War Association, 255 "B" Ward, Racecourse Naka, Sambhaji Nagar, Kolhapur, District : Kolhapur, Through Its Secretary.

3. The Osmanabad Zilla Tug-Of-War Association, House No. 373, Sai Housing Society, Tambari Vibhag, Osmanabad, District : Osmanabad, Through Its Secretary.

4. Zilla Parishad, Solapur, Through Executive Engineer, Public Works Department No.1, District : Solapur.

.. Respondents.

.........................

Mr. Sanjay A. Nandura and Mr. S.B. Choudhari, Advocates, for the petitioner.

(2) W.P. No. 6762 of 2015 Mrs. S.G. Chincholkar, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.1.

Mr. A.S. Deshpande, Advocate, for respondent no.2. Respondent no.3 served (Absent).

Mr. A.B. Dhongade, Advocate, for respondent no.4. ..........................

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : 23RD SEPTEMBER 2015 PER COURT :

1.

Heard learned Counsel for respective parties. 2.

The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with following prayer :- [D] To issue writ of mandamus and any other appropriate directions in the like nature, the respondent nos.1 and 2 may kindly be directed to issue validity certificate after scrutiny of certificate issued by the respondent no.2 for participation in state level competition and merit certificate.

(3) W.P. No. 6762 of 2015 3.

The point raised in this petition is no longer res integra and is covered by the orders of this Court in Writ Petition No. 5272 of 2015, decided on 8th May 2015, and Writ Petition No. 2299 of 2015, decided on 27th February 2015. Hence, for the same reasons, which are assigned in those orders, respondent no.2 shall, after considering its own record and the certificate/s submitted by the petitioners so also the information submitted under the Right to Information Act, decide and verify the said certificates produced by the petitioners, expeditiously and preferably within two months from today.

4.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. ( A.M. BADAR ) ( S.S. SHINDE ) JUDGE JUDGE ................................

puranik / WP6762.15