Lalasaheb Ramhari Maske v. The Collector Osmanabad And Others

{1} 4 sr. no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9387 OF 2015 LALASAHEB RAMHARI MASKE

VERSUS

THE COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Vivekanand V. Ingale. AGP for Respondent No.1 & 2 : Mr. S.G. Karlekar. Respondent No.3 served.

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & A.M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : 7TH JANUARY, 2016.

PER COURT:

1] The grievance of the petitioner is that proceedings filed by the petitioner under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act are not decided though they are pending since February, 2015. 2] Learned AGP submits that in case said proceedings are pending, same would be decided on its own merits.

3] Considering the above, we pass the following order :- [a] In case proceedings are filed by the petitioner under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act and same are pending, then, respondent NO.2/appropriate authority shall decide the said proceedings (Exhibit B page

21) expeditiously, in accordance with law, on its own merit after hearing the concerned, preferably within 9 months.

[b] Writ petition stands disposed of with above directions. [A.M. BADAR] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE JUDGE grt/-