← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6964/2023disposed off

Vijendra Shankarrao Yemekar v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary And Others

2023-06-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme2 pages

27wp6964.2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6964 OF 2023 VIJENDRA SHANKARRAO YEMEKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kulkarni Smita S. AGP for Respondent/s - State : Mr. S.G. Sangale CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATED : 26 JUNE 2023 PER COURT :

1.

Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned AGP.

2.

The petitioner who was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on unaided division has been subsequently transferred to the aided division and the proposal for his transfer has been turned down by the respondent no. 2 - Education Officer, by the impugned communication solely on the ground that by the Government Circular dated 01 December 2022, operation of Rule 41 (1) has been stayed. 3.

We have been consistently passing the orders after this Court at Nagpur Bench in the matter of Friend Social Circle Akola 1/2

27wp6964.2023 through secretary Mohd. Farooque Gulam Gaus and others Versus The State of Maharashtra and others, Writ Petition No. 8215 of 2022 dated 21.12.2022, has stayed operation of the very circular dated 01st December, 2022. Statutory provisions or rules cannot be superseded by the Administrative Act.

4.

The Writ Petition is allowed partly. The communication is quashed and set aside. The respondent no. 2 - Education Officer, may take appropriate decision afresh but shall not be rejected on the ground mentioning the impugned order. The decision shall be taken as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of six weeks from today.

( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ) ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ) SPChauhan 2/2