← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7119/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Swami Samarth Sahakari Gruh Nirman Sanstha Through Its Member Vishwambar Sadashiv Bichhevar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2019-02-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun M. Dhavale2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 30 WRIT PETITION NO.7119 OF 2018 SWAMI SAMARTH SAHAKARI GRUH NIRMAN SANSTHA THROUGH ITS MEMBER VISHWAMBAR SADASHIV

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. P. R. Katneshwarkar i/by Andhale Sandip R.

AGP for Respondents State : Mr. P. S. Patil Advocate for Respondents 2&3: Mr. Mr. Nikhil S. Tekale

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 14th February, 2019 PER COURT :

1.

We have heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned Advocate for the respondents.

2.

The dispute is about the compound wall. It is said that the compound wall is demolished, however, the debris was lying there at the time of grant of status quo.

3.

Mr. Katneshwarkar, learned Advocate submits that the petitioner would approach the Civil Court, however, the order of status quo be continued. 1/2

4.

In the light of above, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings before the Civil Court. 5.

The status quo be maintained for a further period of two weeks. Needless to state that on lapse of two weeks, the said protection will come to an end.

(A. M.DHAVALE,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.) JPC 2/2