Suresh Madhavrao Manwatkar v. The State Of Mah And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 925 FIRST APPEAL NO.213 OF 2013 RANJIT RAOSAHEB MANWATKAR Mr. Ruturaj C. Patil Advocate for Resp. No.3. 926 FIRST APPEAL NO.1157 OF 2013 LIMBAJI DAULAT BOBDE THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS 927 FIRST APPEAL NO.1179 OF 2013 BABASAHEB PANDURANG MANWATKAR

Mr.P.M. Kulkarni, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos. 1 and 2. 928 FIRST APPEAL NO.1181 OF 2013 SHESHRAO PANDURANG MANWATKAR THE STATE OF MAHA AND OTHERS Mr.R.B. Bagul, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos. 1 and 2. Mr.S.C. Arora Advocate for Resp. No.3.

929 FIRST APPEAL NO.1182 OF 2013 MUNJAJI PANDURANG MANWATKAR Mr.S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos. 1 and 2.

930 FIRST APPEAL NO.1324 OF 2013 PANDURANG SAKHARAM MANWATKAR (DIED) LRS SHASHIKALABAI PANDURANG MANWATKAR AND OTHERS THE STATE OF MAH AND OTHERS Mr.Deepak M. Kakade Advocate for Appellants.

Mr.S.C. Arora Advocate for Resp. No.3.

931 FIRST APPEAL NO.1704 OF 2013 UDHAV DNYANOBA BOBDE Mr.S.C. Arora Advocate for Resp. No.3.

932 FIRST APPEAL NO.3144 OF 2013 YOGESH DAGDU KULKARNI AND OTHERS Mr.Deepak M. Kakade Advocate for Appellants.

Mr.P.M. Kulkarni, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos. 1 and 2.

933 FIRST APPEAL NO.2001 OF 2014 AND FA/2002/2014 RAOSAHEB YESHWANTRAO MANWATKAR Mr.R.B. Bagul, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos. 1 and 2. 934 FIRST APPEAL NO.2835 OF 2016 SHIVAJI SAHADU BIDWE (DIED) THROUGH LRS BALIRAM SHIVAJI BIDWE AND ANOTHER Mr.Deepak M. Kakade Advocate for Appellants.

Mr.S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos. 1 and 2. Mr.A.M. Gaikwad Advocate for Resp. No.3.

935 FIRST APPEAL NO.3683 OF 2016 RAMBHAU NANABHAU MANWATKAR

Mr.S.D. Dhongade Advocate for Resp. No.3.

936 FIRST APPEAL NO.615 OF 2019 AND FA/610/2019 BABASAHEB MADHAVRAO MANWATKAR CORAM: ANIL S. KILOR, J.

DATE : 28th APRIL, 2021 ORDER :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

In view of the compromise pursis filed on record, both the parties submit that matters have already been settled between the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the claimants, therefore, submits that the claimants do not want to proceed with the present matters.

3.

Accordingly, in view of the compromise terms stated in the compromise pursis, all the appeals are disposed of. No order as to costs.

4.

As per the compromise, if the amount is deposited by the acquiring body, the claimants are permitted to withdraw the same.

[ANIL S. KILOR, J.] asb/APR21