Nivrutti S/O. Hiraman Gaikwad v. Pooja W/O. Nivrutti Gaikwad

1 922-Cri.Appln.1996-19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 922 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1996 OF 2019 IN REVNST/176/2019 NIVRUTTI S/O. HIRAMAN GAIKWAD

VERSUS

POOJA W/O. NIVRUTTI GAIKWAD ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Deshmukh Shambhuraje V. Advocate for Respondent : Mr. T. M. Venjane.

...

CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.

DATE : 21.07.2022 PER COURT :- 1.

The applicant / husband has challenged the order granting maintenance against him. However, there is delay of 51 days in preferring the present revision.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that there was misunderstanding about the petition to be filed against the impugned order. The delay is short, hence, it may be condoned. Learned counsel for the applicant opposed the application contending that the reasons are not just and proper.

2 922-Cri.Appln.1996-19.odt 3.

Perused the application. Considering the grounds mentioned in the application, the delay is condoned. 4.

The Registry is directed to register the revision according to law.

5.

List the matter on 18.08.2022.

(S. G. MEHARE, J.) ...

vmk/-