Bapurao Shekba Shelke v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

771.21WP.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1047 WRIT PETITION NO.771 OF 2021 BAPURAO SHEKBA SHELKE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER ...

Mr.R.P. Bhumkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, AGP for the respondent/State.

Mr.R.D. Raut, advocate for respondent no.2.

...

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND S.G. DIGE, JJ.

DATE : 14th DECEMBER, 2021 PER COURT :- .

Heard Mr.Bhumkar, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr.Raut, learned advocate for the respondent no.2.

2.

The petitioner has given representation for grant of benefit of time bound pay scale. The learned advocate submits that one Mr.Nandkumar Mandage has been granted benefit, he is similarly situated and the same be directed to be considered.

3.

Mr.Raut, learned advocate for the respondents submits that, the decision would be taken on the representation to the extent of petitioner within three months. The said

771.21WP.odt statement is accepted. Naturally, the respondents will have to consider all the aspects of the matter while taking decision.

4.

In view of that, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

(S.G.DIGE, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) SGA