Maina Vinayak Shinde And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

958 WP 2619 21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 958 WRIT PETITION NO.2619 OF 2021 MAINA VINAYAK SHINDE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Solanke and Solanke Associates AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : Mrs. R.P. Gaur

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & SANDEEP V. MARNE, JJ.

DATE : 14.09.2022.

PER COURT : (PER : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) We have heard both the sides.

2.

The petitioners have filed the present petition seeking benefit of old pension scheme under the provisions of the Maharashtra Civil Service (Pension) Rules 1982 on the premise that their appointments orders were issued prior to 01.11.2005.

3.

The issue involved in the present petition is no more res integra and is covered by the judgment and order dated 06.09.2022 passed in Writ Petition No.13702/2021 Gangu Murlidhar Zade Vs. The State of Maharashtra.

4.

The Writ Petition is accordingly allowed. It is declared that the petitioners would be governed by the provisions of old pension scheme envisaged under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, Maharashtra Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1984 and existing General Provident Fund Scheme (GPF). (SANDEEP V. MARNE J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) mkd/- 1/1