← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/7229/2022delay condonatedrejected

Siddharth Kondiram Sonkamble And ORS v. Manik Adinath Das And ANR

2022-11-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

{1} ca7229.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7229 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 17766 OF 2020 Sidharth s/o Kondiram Sonkamble and others Applicants

Versus

Manik s/o Adinath Das & another Respondents Mr. B. M. Dhanure, advocate for the Applicants Mr. A. S. Usmanpurkar, advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 25th November, 2022.

PC :

Heard rival submissions.

The applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 35 days which appears to be caused due to his fnancial crisis. The learned Counsel for Respondent No.2-Insurance Company strongly opposed the application on the ground that the delay is not properly explained.

However, by considering statutory right of the applicants and the quantum of delay of only 35 days, same

{2} ca7229.22.odt stands allowed subject to the condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay. Appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb