Mrunal @ Rani Dinesh Shisode v. Dinesh Rajendra Sisode

2025:BHC-AUG:32083 ( 1 ) mca188.25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 919 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 188 OF 2025 MRUNAL @ RANI DINESH SHISODE

VERSUS

DINESH RAJENDRA SISODE Mr. R.D. Sanap, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Bhushan Mahajan, Advocte for the respondent.

CORAM

: KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATE : 20.11.2025 PC :- 01.

Heard learned Advocates for the parties. This application is filed by applicant-wife for transfer of matrimonial proceeding bearing Petition No. 63 of 2024 from the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Dhule to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Nashik. It is submitted that the wife is residing with her parents at Nashik. The distance between Nashik and Dhule is approximately 160 kms. It is difficult for the wife to attend the proceeding at Dhule with a daughter of three years age.

02.

This application is opposed by learned Advocate appearing for the respondent-husband. It is submitted that the husband has suffered from heart-attack.

03.

It is seen that the husband suffered heart attack long back and there is no disability shown to the husband as on today. In the matrimonial proceeding, convenience of wife needs to be taken into

( 2 ) mca188.25 consideration. It is difficult for the wife to travel with a daughter of three years and it is also submitted that there is no one to accompany her. 04.

In view of the above, following order :-

ORDER

(i) This Misc. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).

(ii) After transfer of the proceeding, the applicant-wife shall not seek unnecessary adjournments. If it is found that the adjournment is sought unnecessarily, the learned Trial Court shall pass appropriate orders imposing costs upon the applicant-wife, thereby compensating the husband, if he personally remains present in the Court. (iii) The learned Trial Court shall try to dispose of the proceeding as early as possible and preferably within one year from the date of this Court.

(iv) If the respondent-husband makes a request for appearing through video conference, said request shall be considered by the Trial Court liberally.

[KISHORE C. SANT, J.] snk/2025/Nov25/mca188.25