Bombay High CourtWP/15044/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Firoz Issak Sheikh And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2018-06-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun M. Dhavale1 pages

{1} wp1504417.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.15044 OF 2017 Firoz Issak Sheikh & others Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.S.S.Patunkar, advocate for petitioners. Mrs.V.N.Jadhav, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1, 3 and 4. Mr.R.V.Gore, advocate for Respondent No. 5.

CORAM : R.M.BORDE & A.M.DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 21st June, 2018 PER COURT:

The prayers made in the instant petition need not be considered in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction conferred under Article 226 of the Constitution. If at all, by virtue of construction of road, property of the petitioners is likely to be affected, they will have entitlement to claim compensation so also Respondents would be bound to observe the procedure prescribed under law for acquiring the property. No interference is called for. Writ Petition stands dismissed.

A.M.DHAVLE R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE adb/