Gmidc Thr Ee Minor Irrigation Latur. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR
1 C.A. 10718...2008 IN F.A.St. 18935.2008.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10718 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10719 OF 2008 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 18935 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10721 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10723 OF 2008 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 18991 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10724 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10725 OF 2008 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 18996 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10727 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10729 OF 2008 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 19000 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10733 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10734 OF 2008 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 19059 OF 2008
2 C.A. 10718...2008 IN F.A.St. 18935.2008.odt WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10730 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10732 OF 2008 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 19004 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10736 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10737 OF 2008 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 19066 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10739 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10740 OF 2008 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 18967 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10741 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10743 OF 2008 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 18973 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10745 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10746 OF 2008 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 18979 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10748 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10749 OF 2008
3 C.A. 10718...2008 IN F.A.St. 18935.2008.odt FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 18984 OF 2008 Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation Through Exe.Engineer, L.M.I.
Division, Latur. ..... APPLICANT V E R S U S The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... RESPONDENTS .....
Mrs. D.D.Ansingkar, Advocate for Applicant.
Mr. K.N.Lokhande, A.G.P. for R.No. 1 - State. Mr. A.B.Kale, Advocate for R.No. 2.
.....
CORAM : T.V.NALAWADE, J.
DATE : 20th JANUARY, 2016 ORAL ORDER :- .
These Civil Applications are filed for condonation of delay caused in filing applications for grant of leave to file Appeal.
2.
These applications are filed by the acquiring body to challenge the decision given against it by filing Appeal. In view of the right of the acquiring body to contest the Reference, this Court holds that such permission needs to be granted.
4 C.A. 10718...2008 IN F.A.St. 18935.2008.odt 3.
In view of the above contentions and the submissions, this Court holds that sufficient reason is shown. Delay is condoned. These Civil applications are allowed.
[T.V.NALAWADE, J.] KNP/C.A. 10718...2008 IN F.A.St. 18935.2008.odt