← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/330/2004disposed off

Shrirang Ishwar Hanvte And ORS v. State Of Maha And ORS

2016-11-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq3 pages

(1) Cri. W.P. No. 330 of 2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

Criminal Writ Petition No. 330 of 2004 District : Parbhani

1. Shri Shrirang s/o. Ishwar Hanvte, Age : 39 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Hutatmasmarak, Jintur, Taluka Jintur, District Parbhani.

2. Shri Keshav s/o. Mohan Kokare, Age : 48 years, Occupation : Service, Ex-Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Jintur, At present working at Biloli, District Nanded, R/o. Biloli, District Nanded.

3. Shri Faruki Kapilut Raheman, Age : 41 years, Occupation : Business, R/o. Jintur, District Parbhani.

.. Petitioners.

versus

1. The State of Maharashtra.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dy.S.P. Office, Parbhani.

3. The Police Sub-Inspector, Police Station, Jintur.

4. Shri Mukesh Narayanrao Nikalje, Age : 22 years, Occupation : Nil, R/o. Sathe Nagar, Jintur, District Parbhani.

.. Respondents.

(2) Cri. W.P. No. 330 of 2004 ............

Mr. R.T. Nagargoje, Advocate, holding for Mr. S.P. Sonpawale, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. A.R. Kale, Addl. Public Prosecutor, for respondent nos.1 to 3.

Mr. S.G. Shinde, Advocate, for respondent no.4 (Absent).

............

CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATE : 29TH NOVEMBER 2016 ORAL ORDER:

The petitioners have challenged the order passed by the learned Magistrate directing the Police to investigate on the complaint for offence under Section 306 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and submit report.

02.

The learned Addl. Public Prosecutor has placed on record copy of communication sent by Police Inspector, Police Station, Jintur, to the office of the Public Prosecutor on 25th November, 2016 in which it is stated that the investigation was conducted and "C" summary was filed.

03.

The learned Addl. Public Prosecutor and the learned Advocate for the petitioners states that in view of subsequent development, the challenge in the petition has become infructuous.

(3) Cri. W.P. No. 330 of 2004 04.

The Writ Petition is disposed accordingly. Parties to bear their own costs.

( Z.A. HAQ ) JUDGE ..........

puranik / CRIWP330.04