← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7062/2015dismissedrule discharged

Ghungaroo Loknatya Kala Kendra Through Its Proprietor Sanjivani Rambhau Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2015-07-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora2 pages

{1} wp706215.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7062 OF 2015 Ghungaroo Loknatya Kala Kendra, Jamkhed, Tq. Jamkhed, Dist.Ahmednagar Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.N.V.Gaware, advocate for the petitioner Mr.S.G.Nandedkar, A.G.P. for Respondents.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.7089 OF 2015 Jagdamba Sanskrutik Kala Kendra, Jamkhed, Tq. Jamkhed, Dist.Ahmednagar Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.N.V.Gaware, advocate for the petitioner Mr.N.B.Patil, A.G.P. for Respondents.

CORAM : R.M.BORDE & P.R.BORA, JJ.

DATE : 21st July, 2015 PER COURT:

Both the petitioners raise challenge to the show cause notice issued by the Tahsildar, Jamkhed on 01.07.2015. In exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in our view, no interference is

{2} wp706215.odt called for in the matter.

The petitioners apprehend that the Tahsildar is likely to take decision in prejudicial manner on consideration of contents of the communication issued by the District Collector, Ahmednagar, on 24.06.2015. The apprehension expressed by the petitioner is unfounded since no decision, as yet, has been taken by the Tahsildar and the Tahsildar, who is the Taluka Executive Magistrate, has been instructed to conduct inquiry and take decision in the matter by the Collector, is expected to act independently and take decision on the basis of material produced before him. Writ Petitions are devoid of substance. Both the writ petitions stand dismissed.

P.R.BORA R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE adb/wp706215