← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/12155/2015disposed offdismissed for default

Yojana Haribhau Manjarmkar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2016-07-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde2 pages

12155.15WP FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ WRIT PETITION NO. 12155 OF 2015 YOJANA HARIBHAU MANJARMKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for petitioner:Mr. R.M. Jade holding for Mr. G.G. Suraywanshi A.G.P. for respondent/State:Mr.A.G. Magre Advocate for Respondent No.2:Mr.S.B. Pulkundwar Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. P.V.

Balkhande holding for Mr. S.C. Bhosale Advocate for Respondent No.4: Mr. R.M. Gaikwad ...

CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

Dated: JULY 19, 2016 ...

There is innocuous prayer of the petitioner in the Petition, in as much as, the direction is sought to Respondent No.2 to decide the proposals dated 26th December, 2011 and 31st March, 2012 as regards to the individual approval to the appointment of the petitioner as an Assistant Teacher.

12155.15WP 2.

Respondent No.2 is directed to take decision on the said proposals, if already decision is not taken, as expeditiously as possible, and preferably, within 8 weeks from today and communicate the said decision to the petitioner and also Respondent Nos. 3 and 4.

3.

Needless to observe that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the said proposals and it is for Respondent No.2 to take decision in accordance with law.

4.

The petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

5.

The parties shall act upon an authenticated copy of this order.

(SANGITRAO S.PATIL, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J) sga/