Ajinkya Satish Gaikwad v. The State Of Maharashtra

criapln3999-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3999 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 509 OF 2006 (Ajinkya Satish Gaikwad Vs. The State of Maharashtra) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 519 OF 2006 (Shyamrao Namdeo Harba Vs. The State of Maharashtra) ---- Mr. Satej S. Jadhav, Advocate for the applicant/ appellant in Cri. Application No. 3999/2014 and Cri. Appeal No. 509/2006 Mr. R.N. Dhorde, Senior Advocate for the appellant in Cri. Appeal No. 519/2006 Mr. S.R. Palnitkar, A.P.P. for the respondent-State ---- CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 21/07/2015 ORAL ORDER :

1.

Heard. Read the police report which shows that original appellant - Satish has died. The present applicant i.e. the son of the deceased appellant wants to continue with Criminal Appeal No. 509/2006. In the circumstances, the applicant is permitted to continue with Criminal Appeal No. 509/2006 in place of his father

criapln3999-2014 - deceased Satish. Necessary corrections in the title clause of the appeal be carried during the course of the day.

2.

The present application accordingly stands disposed of.

[M.T. JOSHI] JUDGE npj/criapln3999-2014