← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8231/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Nandkishor Sitaram Tangadpalle And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2019-07-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 51 WRIT PETITION NO.8231 OF 2019 NANDKISHOR SITARAM TANGADPALLE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Rathod Vivek U. AGP for Respondents : Mrs. M.A. Deshpande.

CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE :

08/07/2019 PER COURT :

The petitioners claim to be the members of the nonteaching staff, Class-IV of Triable Ashram School. The learned A.G.P. accepts notice for all the respondents. The issue is no longer res-intigra, in view of the judgment of this Court at it's Principal Seat at Bombay in Writ Petition No. 2358/2013 with other connected writ petitions under order dated 21.09.2013.

4.

In the light of the above, we adopt the same course and pass following order.

1/2

ORDER

The respondents are directed to examine cases of each of the individual petitioners, for deciding whether they satisfy the criteria, laid-down for claiming benefits under ACPS, applicable to the private aided schools, under the Government Resolution dated 30.04.1998 and as modified from time to time and if it is found that, the petitioners satisfy the eligibility criteria, the respondents shall extend the benefits to the petitioners. Respondents shall scrutinize the cases of each petitioner within a period of six months from today and extend the benefits to such of eligible petitioners, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of four months from the date of scrutiny of the proposals.

5.

Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) mkd 2/2