← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/9910/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Shivram Wamanrao Ubale v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2016-07-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde2 pages

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ 1024 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.446 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITIO NO.2137/2013 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9910/2016 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.446/2015 SHIVRAM WAMANRAO UBALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AD OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Salgare Vitthal G.

AGP for Respondents/State:Mr.V.S. Badakh.

Advocate for R.Nos.2 & 3: Mr.A.D.

Gadekar.

...

CORAM: S.S. SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

Dated: July 19, 2016 ...

The learned Counsel for respondents No.2 and 3, on instructions, submits that the respondents have prepared chart and the amount will be disbursed in three installments by handing over the cheques to the petitioner through his advocate.

2.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is difference of Rs.10,000/- in the amount

446.15CP calculated and so as to claim the said amount, he will once again approach the Education Officer.

3.

We make it clear that the Education Officer shall not unnecessarily widen the scope of the inquiry as ordered by the Court since respondent Nos.2 and 3 have agreed to pay the balance amount of Rs.2,97,644/- by way of giving three cheques to the petitioner through his advocate.

4.

Nothing further survives for consideration in this contempt petition.

The contempt petition stands disposed of.

Consequently, the civil application stands disposed of.

(SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J)(S.S. SHINDE, J) kadam/