Siddharth Ramdhan Dandge And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1819 OF 2018 1.

Siddharth Ramdhan Dange, [Ori. Accused No.1] Age - 31 years, Occu - Nil.

Vikrant Ramdhan Dange, [Ori. Accused No.2] Age - 33 years, Occu - Business, 3.

Deepali Vikrant Dange, [Ori. Accused No.3] Age - 25 years, Occu - House Wife, Gunwanti Ramdhan Dange [Ori. Accused No.4] Age - 59 years, Occu - House Wife, All Applicants / Accused are residing at:

D-141, CIDCO, N-2, Near Ambika Nagar, Aurangabad.

... APPLICANTS V E R S U S 1.

State of Maharashtra, Through Police Inspector, Police Station Mukundwadi, Aurangabad.

2.

Nutan Siddharth Dange, [Ori. Complainant] Age - 28 years, Occu - House Wife, R/o. Ambika Nagar Galli, No 8, Aurangabad.

... RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. Amol P. Ghule Patil, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. R. V. Dasalkar, APP for Respondent No.1 / State. Mr. Rupesh Jaiswal, Advocate for Respondent No.2. ...

CORAM :

T. V. NALAWADE & SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.

DATE :

04th September, 2018.

ORAL JUDGMENT: ( Per T. V. Nalawade, J. ) .

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, heard both the sides for final disposal.

The proceeding is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for relief of quashing of FIR No.84 of 2017, registered with Mukundwadi Police Station, District Aurangabad, for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 354-B, 498-A, 323 and 504 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and also the charge-sheet filed in the said crime to which number is given as R.C.C. No.310 of 2018, in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aurangabad. During arguments, the counsels for both the sides submitted that the parties have settled the dispute. To that effect, reply affidavit of first informant is filed. She has contended that out of misunderstanding, he has given report and she wants to lead the life with the husband. The submissions made show that no injury was

sustained by the first informant though she has made allegations that an attempt on her life was made. In view of these circumstances, this Court holds that relief needs to be granted to the Applicants. In the result, the following order is passed:

O R D E R

I.

The application is allowed.

II.

Relief is granted in terms of prayer clause (B). III.

Rule is made absolute in those terms.

[ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. ] [ T. V. NALAWADE, J. ] ndm