Chetan Subhash Bharati v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

967 wp7761.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 967 WRIT PETITION NO.7761 OF 2019 CHETAN SUBHASH BHARATI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Solanke Shrikrashna B. AGP for Respondents: S.P.Deshmukh ----- CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 26/06/2019 PER COURT :

Heard. Notice. The learned A.G.P. accepts notice for respondent nos. 1 to 3.

2] The petitioner is assailing the order cancelling admission in the G.N.M. Course. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had received validity certificate on 13.05.2019. The respondents cancelled admission of the petitioner on the ground that validity is not submitted within six months and that the petitioner had given undertaking to submit the validity.

3] The learned Additional Government Pleader submits that the petitioner was bound to submit validity within the stipulated period. Upon non submission of the validity certificate within the stipulated period, the respondent no.3 legitimately cancelled the admission of the petitioner.

967 wp7761.19 4] It appears that the petitioner has been issued with the validity certificate of N.T.D. Category on 13.05.2019. It was not in the hands of the litigant to get the proceeding decided within stipulated period, it is for the committee to decide it after conducting vigilance. The petitioner cannot be said to be at fault.

5] As the petitioner has already been issued with the validity certificate, we quash and set aside the impugned order cancelling the admission of the petitioner.

6] In view of the impugned order being set aside, necessary consequences shall follow.

7] Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

(MANGESH S. PATIL,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) umg/