Sindhu Kashinath Rahate And ORS v. Union Of India

939-CA-12043-2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 939 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12043 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 18634 OF 2019 SINDHU KASHINATH RAHATE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA ...

Mr. V.B. Madan - Advocate for Applicants Ms. Nikita N. Gore - Advocate for Respondent ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 21st July, 2023 PER COURT :

1.

Learned Counsel - Ms. Nikita N. Gore causes appearance on behalf of sole respondent.

2.

Heard rival submissions.

3.

The applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 708 days, which appears to be caused due to their poor financial condition. The learned Counsel for respondent - Union of India strongly opposed the application on the ground that, there is circulation delay.

Pooja K.

1/2

939-CA-12043-2021 4.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay of 708 days in this application stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay and also for delay in circulating the matter belatedly.

5.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

6.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

[ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE Pooja K.

2/2