Dilipsing Ramsing Ghusinge v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr Collector, Jalna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 915 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7227 OF 2022 IN FAST/18141/2020 DILIPSING RAMSING GHUSINGE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR COLLECTOR, JALNA ...

AND 916 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7228 OF 2022 IN FAST/18139/2020 SONABAI KAPPUSING SUNDARDE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

917 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7248 OF 2022 IN FAST/18143/2020 RAMSING SHIVLAL GHUSINGE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

918 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8000 OF 2022 IN FAST/18178/2020 SHIVSING RATAN DUNAWAT (DIED) THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE KAMANBAI SHIVSING DUNAWAT AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Ms. Aparna Sapate h/f. Mr. Shinde Shrikishan S.

AGP for Respondents - State : Mr. S. N. Kendre, Mr. A. B. Chate, Mr. B.

V.

Virdhe, ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 11.01.2023 PER COURT :

Heard rival submissions. The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods as mentioned therein which appear to be caused due to their financial crisis. The learned AGP strongly opposed the application on the ground that there is also circulation delay. The learned counsel for the Acquiring Body in one matter remained absent. In the other three matters, the respondent Acquiring Body despite service remained absent. 2.

Considering the statutory right of the applicants, the delay periods mentioned in all these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid periods of delay and also for the delay in circulating the matter belatedly.

3.

Appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

4.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-