Savita Pandit Bansode v. Pandit Pandurang Bansode

1 MCA-134-2016-JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 134 OF 2016 Savita W/o Pandit Bansode, Age : 37 years, Occu.: Household, R/o. C/o. Raghunath S/o Bhimrao Khade, Ramrao Pawar Marg, Shrinagar, Nanded, Tq. & Dist. Nanded .. Applicant Vs.

Pandit S/o Pandurang Bansode, Age : 40 years, Occu.: Service, R/o. Belore, Tq. Mantha, Dist. Jalna .. Respondent ---- Mr. Mahesh V. Ghatge, Advocate for the applicant None for the respondent though served ---- CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : 16/01/2017 ORAL JUDGMENT :

1.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Respondent though served long back, is not causing appearance. Learned counsel for the applicant draws attention to that, two proceedings one for maintenance and other for offence in respect of section 494 read with section 109 of the Indian Penal Code at Nanded and are being attended to by the respondent. Additionally, it is being submitted that the applicant is a rustic woman and does not muster enough confidence to attend proceedings at Jalna independently and there is no person who would be able to accompany her and visit

2 MCA-134-2016-JUDGMENT frequently Jalna. Aforesaid submissions go uncontroverted in the absence of other side and to quite a long way suggest tacit acceptance of the request under the application.

2.

In view of aforesaid, Miscellaneous civil application is allowed. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (A). 3.

Misc. civil application accordingly stands disposed of. [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE arp/