Rohini Vasantrao Pande v. State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 913 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8704 OF 2018 IN WP/3515/2015 ROHINI VASANTRAO PANDE

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. U.R.Awate for Talekar And Associates AGP for Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr. A.P.Basarkar ---- CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND SUNIL K.KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : JULY 13, 2018 O R D E R :

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned AGP for respondents.

2.

Writ Petitions are pending. Even otherwise the non-applicants will have every right to controvert the averments sought to be introduced by way of amendment by fililng affidavit.

ca8704.18 3.

For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'A'. 4.

Civil Applications disposed of.

[SUNIL K.KOTWAL, J.] [S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.] dbm