Dhanraj Narsingdas Pallod v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

( 1 ) aba319.21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 976 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.319 OF 2021 WITH ABA/318/2021 WITH APPLN/1602/2021 IN ABA/318/2021 WITH APPLN/1603/2021 IN ABA/319/2021 V.M. MOHAMMED DAWOOD KHAN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Ms.Khevana Dagli, Advocate for applicant in ABA/319/2021 Mr.Amar V. Lavte h/f. Mr.Shivam S. Jaiswal, Advocate for applicant in ABA/318/2021.

Mr.A.V. Deshmukh, APP for the respondent/State. Mr.S.J. Salunke, Advocate for assist to APP.

CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.

DATED :

05.08.2021 PC :- 01.

Both the applicants were heard extensively at least on two occasions. Whilst this Court was not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail, the applicants voluntarily agreed to compensate the complainant. On this count the hearing was deferred.

02.

Today learned Counsel for the applicants, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the anticipatory bail applications.

03.

Leave granted.

( 2 ) aba319.21 04.

Both the anticipatory bail applications are dismissed as withdrawn.

05.

All criminal applications therein are disposed of.

[SANDEEP K. SHINDE,J.] snk/2021/AUG21/aba319.21