Bandu Fakira Bhil Died Thr Lrs Lilabai Bandu Bhil (Malche) v. The Collector Dhule And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9723 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 18483 OF 2023 SITABAI HIMMAL MALACHE (BHIL) AND 910 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9724 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 18480 OF 2023 AASARAM DEORAM BHIL (DIED) THR LRS SOJABAI AASARAM BHIL AND 911 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9725 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 18482 OF 2023 SANJAY SHAMA BHIL AND 912 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9726 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 18422 OF 2023 BHARATSINGH NARAYANSING GIRASE AND 913 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9727 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 18424 OF 2023 1/4

SADASHIV NATHA BHIL DIED THR LRS BANABAI SADASHIV THAKARE (BHIL) AND 914 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9728 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 18477 OF 2023 DALPAT PAULAT GIRASE AND 915 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9729 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 18474 OF 2023 ANANDA KAUTIK PAWAR AND 916 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9730 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 18433 OF 2023 SUKDEO TANAKU MALCHE (BHIL) AND 918 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9732 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 18419 OF 2023 DAGA NAGO GIRASE AND 919 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9733 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 18476 OF 2023 2/4

BANDU FAKIRA BHIL DIED THR LRS LILABAI BANDU BHIL (MALCHE) ...

Mr. B.K. Pawar h/f. Mr. A.B. Kale - Advocate for Applicants Mr. S.P. Tiwari, Mr. R.D. Sanap, Mr. S.N. Kendre and Mr. B.V. Virdhe - AGP's for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, State Mr. V.V. Tarde - Advocate for Respondent No.3 ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 10th August, 2023 PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

Issue notice to the respondents.

3.

Learned AGP waives service for respondent Nos.1 and 2, State and learned Counsel - Mr. V.V. Tarde also waives service for respondent No.3 - acquiring body.

4.

Heard rival submissions.

5.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned in these applications, which appear to be caused due to their poor financial condition. 3/4

6.

The learned A.G.P. as well as learned Counsel for the respondent - acquiring body strongly opposed the applications on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay periods.

7.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay periods mentioned in these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the periods of aforesaid delay.

8.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

9.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE 4/4