Vinayak Dnyanoba Kawale And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

930-CA-5343-18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5343 OF 2018 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 20216 OF 2017 Vinayak Dnyanoba Kawale and Another ..APPLICANTS

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra and Another ..RESPONDENTS AND CA/5344/2018 IN FAST/20247/2017 AND CA/5346/2018 IN FAST/20243/2017 AND CA/5347/2018 IN FAST/20245/2017 ....

Mr. E.S. Murge, Advocate for applicants Mr. P.M. Kulkarni, A.G.P. for respondent no.1 Mr. R.B. Gaikwad, Advocate for respondent no.2 ....

CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT, J.

DATE : 12th AUGUST, 2021 PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

There is substantial delay in preferring the appeals. The balance can however be struck if the appellants are held to be not entitled for component of interest, if any, for the delayed period in preferring the appeals. 1 / 2

930-CA-5343-18.odt 3.

Civil applications are, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clause (B), on condition that the applicants/appellants shall not be entitled for interest, if any, on enhanced amount, if any, for the delayed period. ( R.G. AVACHAT, J. ) SSD 2 / 2