The State Of Mah And ORS v. Ambadas Nana Mali

( 1 )

IN THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT PRESIDED OVER BY

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT, HELD ON 12.11.2022, AT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES SUB-COMMITTEE AT AURANGABAD.

91 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11009 OF 2010 IN FAST/19685/2010 WITH CA/11010/2010 IN FAST/19685/2010 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

VERSUS

AMBA KERBA MASKE 93 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14704 OF 2010 IN FAST/25755/2010 WITH CA/14705/2010 IN FAST/25755/2010 THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

VERSUS

PARUBAI TRIMBAK DHAKANE 94 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.17077 OF 2010 IN FAST/33651/2010 WITH CA/17076/2010 IN FAST/33564/2010 WITH CA/17075/2010 IN FAST/33564/2010 WITH CA/17078/2010 IN FAST/33651/2010 THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

VERSUS

SAMBHAJI PANDURANG BANSODE AND ANR 95 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.17354 OF 2010 IN FAST/33654/2010 WITH CA/17353/2010 IN FAST/33569/2010 WITH CA/17355/2010 IN FAST/33654/2010 WITH CA/17356/2010 IN FAST/33657/2010 WITH CA/17352/2010 IN FAST/33569/2010 WITH CA/17357/2010 IN FAST/33657/2010 THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

VERSUS

MARUTI MASAJI BHOSALE 96 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.18641 OF 2010 IN FAST/36860/2010 WITH CA/18647/2010 IN FAST/36893/2010 WITH CA/18646/2010 IN FAST/36887/2010 WITH CA/18648/2010 IN FAST/36893/2010 WITH CA/18643/2010 IN FAST/36884/2010 WITH CA/18642/2010 IN FAST/36860/2010 WITH CA/18645/2010 IN FAST/36887/2010 WITH CA/18644/2010 IN FAST/36884/2010 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

( 2 )

VERSUS

CHANDRAKANT SUBRAV PATIL 97 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13938 OF 2011 IN FAST/25055/2011 WITH CA/13940/2011 IN FAST/25114/2011 WITH CA/13939/2011 IN FAST/25055/2011 WITH CA/13941/2011 IN FAST/25114/2011 THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA AND ANR

VERSUS

BAPU CHANDRAHAR DEVARE AND ANR 98 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10395 OF 2012 IN FAST/19805/2012 WITH CA/10397/2012 IN FAST/19819/2012 WITH CA/10396/2012 IN FAST/19805/2012 WITH CA/10400/2012 IN FAST/19822/2012 WITH CA/10398/2012 IN FAST/19819/2012 WITH CA/10399/2012 IN FAST/19822/2012 THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

VERSUS

AMBADAS NANA MALI 99 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5787 OF 2015 IN FAST/12299/2015 WITH CA/5788/2015 IN FAST/12299/2015 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

VERSUS

SAHADEO APPARAO PIMPLE AND OTHERS 100 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5808 OF 2015 IN FAST/12251/2015 WITH CA/5807/2015 IN FAST/12251/2015 WITH CA/5805/2015 IN FAST/12232/2015 WITH CA/5806/2015 IN FAST/12232/2015 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

VERSUS

GANGARAM RAOSAHEB SONNAR AND ANOTHER Mr.S.R. Yadav-Lonikar, AGP for the appellant/State. Mr.N.B. Jadhav, Advocate for the respondent.

O R D E R

01.

Having regard to the reasons mentioned in the applications and as the parties have arrived at amicable settlement, it is desirable to condone

( 3 ) the delay. The delay stands condoned. The Civil Applications for condonation of delay in respective matters stand disposed off. Office to register the appeals.

02.

These appeals are placed before us in today's Lok Adalat. Mr. M.B. Bothikar, Tahsildar, Umri, Dist.Nanded is present. 03.

Mr. Yadav, learned AGP submits that above numbered group of appeals is squarely covered by Government Resolution No. Sankirna-2014/pra.kra4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Government Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution. Hence, this group of appeals can be withdrawn as per the policy decision taken by the Government of Maharashtra. Accordingly, the State is withdrawing these appeals.

04.

The learned AGP states that entire amount in these appeals has been deposited in the Reference Court. The respondents-original claimants are at liberty to withdraw the amount.

05.

However, before disposing off the appeals, it is further clarified that in case the amount is not deposited as per the award, the State Government undertakes to deposit the said amount within a period of one year in the concerned Reference Court. If the amount is not withdrawn by the claimants/respondents, same is allowed to be withdrawn and office to allow withdrawal. If the said amount is not deposited, the claimants are at liberty to

( 4 ) withdraw the same after depositing the amount. 06.

The First Appeals stand disposed of as withdrawn. 07.

No order as to costs.

08.

The court fee refund certificate be issued as per the provisions under the Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959.

09.

In view of withdrawal of the appeals, pending civil application/s, if any, stand disposed of.

[A.R. BORULKAR] [S.G. SHETE] [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] Advocate District Judge (Retd.) Head of Panel Member Member snk/2022/OCT22/ca11009.10