Mangala Suresh Gite v. The Zilla Parishad Nagpur Through Chief Executive Officer And Another
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 925 WRIT PETITION NO.8370 OF 2021 MANGALA SURESH GITE
VERSUS
THE ZILLA PARISHAD NAGPUR THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ANOTHER ...
AND 926 WRIT PETITION NO.8374 OF 2021 MANGALA GOVERDHAN DHANDE
VERSUS
THE ZILLA PARISHAD AMRAVATI THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ANOTHER ...
AND 935 WRIT PETITION NO.1621 OF 2022 MADHURI GOVINDRAO SONPAROTE
VERSUS
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND OTHERS ...
AND 980 WRIT PETITION NO.8109 OF 2021 MANISHA ATUL UPASANI
VERSUS
THE NAGPUR MAHANAGARPALIKA KARMACHARI SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED AND ANOTHER ....
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. R. S. Parsodkar AGP for Respondent-State/authorities: Mr. P.S. Patil and S.G. Sangle Advocate for Respondents 1 and 2 in WP No. 8370 of 2021 : Mr. S.R. Dheple .....
AND 959 WRIT PETITION NO.6726 OF 2022 WASUDEO NARAYANRAO MENGEWAR
VERSUS
-2THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ANOTHER ...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Yeramwar Sushant C. AGP for Respondent-State/authorities: Mr. S.G. Karlekar .....
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATED : 19th JANUARY, 2023.
PER COURT :- 1.
The learned senior advocate representing these petitioners relies upon the judgment of this court (Coram S.V. Gangapurwala and Shrikant D. Kulkarni, JJ.) dated 04.05.2021, in the matter of Raja Tukaram Shinde and others vs. State of Maharashtra and another (Writ petition No. 903 of 2020 and group of cases). He submits that these petitions can be disposed off in the light of the view taken by this Court in the said judgment dated 04.05.2021. 2.
The leaned A.G.P. submits that the judgment in Raja Tukaram Shinde (supra), is now a subject matter of Special Leave Petition before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The learned senior advocate submits that these petitions in hand can be disposed off and the petitioners are aware that the law that would be laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court while dealing with the judgment in Raja Tukaram Shinde (supra) would be squarely applicable to the cases of these petitioners.
3.
In view of the above, these petitions are disposed off, by
-3recording a statement of the learned senior advocate. The conclusion in para No.27 in Raja Tukaram Shinde (supra) would also be applicable in each of these cases.
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , J.) rlj/