Fala-A-Millat Bahu-Uddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Through Its President v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

9065.16ca FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ 907 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9065 OF 2016 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5489/2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10712 OF 2014 FALA-A-MILLAT BAHU-UDDESHIYA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL, THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant :Mr.G V Mohekar AGP for Respondents/State: Mr.A.V. Deshmukh.

Advocate for Respondent 4 : Mr.C.V. Thombre.

...

CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

Dated: JULY 05, 2016 ...

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned Counsel for the applicant / petitioner submits that the intervenor, whose application has been allowed, has no locus even to intervene in the petition, he has no concern with the subject matter of the petition, and his services have been already terminated. He has also

9065.16ca filed an appeal before the School Tribunal, which is pending.

3.

Upon hearing the learned Counsel for the applicant / petitioner and the intervenor, we are of the opinion that the issue as to whether the intervenor has locus or not, can be considered at the time of final hearing.

4.

With the above observations, civil application stands disposed of.

(SANGITRAO S.PATIL, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J) kadam/