← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPLN/2289/2022application allowed

Deegambar @ Digambar Venkat Gound (Mali) v. The State Of Maharashtra

2022-11-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat,Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2289 OF 2022 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.751 OF 2022 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 752 OF 2022 DEEGAMBAR @ DIGAMBAR VENKAT GOUND (MALI)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER Mr. M. L. Dharashive, Advocate for the applicant Mr. S. P. Deshmukh, APP for the respondent/State Mr. D. J. Patil, Advocate for respondent No. 2 (appointed) CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT & R. M. JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : 30th NOVEMBER, 2022 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2.

It is informed to this Court that the applicant is sentenced to suffer short term imprisonment for 7 years. According to the learned counsel for the appellant there is no likelihood of appeal being heard in near future and hence of interest of justice required suspension of sentence. 3.

Learned APP as well as learned counsel for respondent No. 2 opposed the said contention by citing serious 925.ca2289.22.odt

nature of offence.

4.

Applicant is handed over with short term sentence. Considering the pendency there is no likelihood of appeal being taken up for hearing in short time. There is no special reason to deny bail to the applicant. In the circumstances substantive sentence imposed on the applicant deserves to be suspended. Hence the order.

ORDER

(i) Application is allowed.

(ii) Substantive sentence is suspended till the disposal of the criminal appeal.

(iii) Applicant be released on PR bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount. Bail in the Trial Court.

(ii) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) (R. G. AVACHAT, J.) ssp 925.ca2289.22.odt