Raju Vaijnath Mankar And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

CA 11789/2016 IN WP 1223/2015 - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11789/2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1223/2015 Raju S/o Vaijnath Mankar & others.

...Applicants..

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others.

..Non-Applicants.

Respondents..

.....

Shri P.P.Komple,Advocate for Applicants.

Shri S.B.Pulkundwar, Advocate for Non-Applicant / Respondent Nos.2 & 3.

Shri V.S.Badak, AGP for the State.

.....

CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA & K.L. WADANE, JJ.

DATE: 30.09.2016 ORDER :

1] Issue notice to non-applicants / respondents. 2] Learned AGP appears for the respondent no.1 and Shri Pulkundwar, learned counsel appears for the respondent nos.2 & 3.

3] Learned counsel for the applicants states that on 8.12.2015, when the matter was on the Board, he could not

CA 11789/2016 IN WP 1223/2015 - 2 - remain present as he was not feeling well.

4] Learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 & 3 opposes the request for restoration.

5] We have heard the learned counsel for the nonapplicants / respondents. 6] Considering the reasons given for the absence of the learned Advocate for the applicants / original petitioners, the application is allowed. The writ petition is restored.

(K.L. WADANE, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) ndk/c3091618.doc