Nasim Banu Akbar Khan v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

4 WRIT PETITION NO. 77 OF 2016 VASANT NARAYAN CHOUDHARI NIMBAJI NARAYAN CHOUDHARI Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. V.P. Patil Advocate for Respondents :Mr.R.D.Borde h/f Mr. U.S. Malte Learned counsel for the respondent prays for an adjournment. Stand over to 11.8.2017 at the request of the respondent.

18 WRIT PETITION NO. 10103 OF 2016 NANDLAL GANGARAM RANGLANI THE JALGAON PEOPLES CO OP BANK LTD THROUGH ASSTT GENERAL MANAGER Advocate for Petitioners : Ms.S.V. Salunke h/f Mr. V.D. Salunke The petitioner, who is the defendant in Special Civil Suit No.57/2012, has moved Application Exhibit 70, seeking production of documents. By the impugned order dated 27.7.2016, the trial Court has rejected the application, on the grounds that in matters of cooperative nature, the Court lacks inherent jurisdiction. Though, by not permitting the production of documents, the defendant would lose an opportunity, but as the suit is only for compensation on the ground of defamation, the documents would not be useful. Issue notice to respondent returnable on 11.8.2017.

19 WRIT PETITION NO. 11052 OF 2016 DYANESHWAR DEEPCHAND JOGI SANJAY TRAYAMBAK KULKARNI Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. M.G. Patil Advocate for Respondents :Mr Joslya Menzes h/f Mr. A.S. Sawale Pursuant to the order dated 18.11.2016, though the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, he has researched on the provisions of the Indian Registration Act, he has not placed the registered document on record which bears the endorsement made by the Sub Registrar. He seeks to place it on record. Stand over to 11.8.2017.

The petitioner shall place the above said document on record on or before 1st day of August, 2017.

23 WRIT PETITION NO. 12651 OF 2016 SHIVDAS SANTRAM GAVHANE RAVINDRA SUDHAKAR GHADGE Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. G.K. Thigale (Naik) Advocate for Respondents :Mr. M.S. Indani Learned counsel for the sole respondent submits that after he receives a copy of the writ petition from the petitioner, he would work out this matter.

By consent of the parties, stand over to 2.8.2017 in the supplementary board.

Considering the above, the Trial Court would adjourn the pending RCS No.367/2011 beyond the next date of hearing in this matter.

24 WRIT PETITION NO. 10501 OF 2012 MADHAVRAO YASHWANTRAO ULAGADDE RAMESH BAPURAO PATIL Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. A.S. More Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has recently passed away and he would take steps to bring the LRs on record.

As such, removed from the board.

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J )

25 WRIT PETITION NO. 10505 OF 2012 SUDHAKAR YADHAVRAO SHELKE GUNDERAO ATMARAM SHELKE AND ORS Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. A.S. Deshpande AGP for respondent Nos.2 & 3: Mr. N.T. Bhagat Advocate for Respondents :Mr. S.S. Panale The fact that the litigating sides having settled the matter amongst themselves, has been recorded by this Court in its orders dated 17.6.2015 and 4.7.2017.

As a last chance, stand over to 28.7.2017 in the supplementary board for passing orders of disposal.

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J )

26 WRIT PETITION NO. 10563 OF 2012 WITH CA/14713/2015 IN WP/10563/2012 SUNITA @ SYERA SARDARKHAN PATHAN AND ORS AFZALBEE AMEERKHAN PATHAN AND ORS Advocate for Petitioners : Mr A.P. Bhandari Advocate for Respondents :Mr. A.S.Deshpande Shri A.P. Bhandari submits that Shri Khan, learned advocate has already obtained his consent to appear on behalf of the petitioners and he no- longer represents the petitioners.

None for the petitioners though the names of Shri Khan and Shri Urgunde, learned Advocates are shown on the board. Appearance of Shri A.P. Bhandari, learned Advocate is, therefore, discharged.

Stand over to 31.7.2017 as a last chance.

Interim relief granted earlier to continue till the next date.

29 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8255 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6410 OF 2014 WITH WP/7037/2014 NASIM BANU AKBAR KHAN THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. R.R. Sancheti AGP for Respondents:Mr N.T. Bhagat Advocate for Respondent No.5:Mr. M.M. Bhokarikar I have heard learned Advocates for the respective sides. Though the order of the Honourable Minister dated 2.6.2015 has been challenged in the petition, the proposed prayers were inadvertently not stated in the prayer clause. Considering the above, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'. The amendment be carried out within two weeks with copies of the amended writ petition to the litigating sides. Stand over to 14.8.2017.

35 WRIT PETITION NO. 159 OF 2016 SHAIKH BISMILLAH SHAIKH NAWAB SHAIKH ABDULLAH SHAIKH NAWAB Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Shaikh Mujtaba Gulam Mustafa Advocate for Respondents :Mr. Shaikh Mohammad Naseer A. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to research as to whether a Civil Revision application, in place of a Writ petition, would be maintainable or not.

Stand over to 2.8.2017 at the request of the parties. Matter to come up in the supplementary board.

37 WRIT PETITION NO. 599 OF 2016 BHIMA SHANKAR TAMBE AND ANOTHER THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PATHARDI, AHMEDNAGAR AND OTHERS Advocate for Petitioners : Mr D.A. Mane h/f Mr. P.A. Bharat AGP for Respondents No.1 & 2:Mr. S.P.Deshmukh ...

By order dated 24.4.2017, notice of final disposal was issued to respondent No.3, as he continued to remain absent in this proceedings. None appers for respondent No.3.

Stand over to 4.8.2017 to enable respondent No.3 to participate in this proceedings, failing which this matter would be considered without his assistance.

Interim relief granted earlier to continue.