Rajendra Vithal Puri v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1 WRIT PETITION NO.9892 OF 2013 RAJENDRA VITHAL PURI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Naiknavare Ramesh V. Mr. NB Patil, AGP for Respondents.

...

CORAM : R. M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ.

Dated: July 30, 2015 ...

PER COURT :- 1) Heard. This petition can be disposed of by issuing directions to the respondents/State through Collector or his subordinate officer, to take a decision on the application dated 29.11.2011, tendered by the petitioner under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in accordance with the provisions of law, as expeditiously as possible, and preferably within a period of six months from today and it is accordingly directed.

2) The petitioner makes a statement that no First Appeal has been presented against the Judgment and Award, which is the basis for tendering the application by the petitioner, under Section 28-A of the Act.

3) With the directions, as above, the writ petition is disposed of.

( P.R. BORA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. ) ...

BDV