Suraj Lahu Torkad v. The State Of Maharashtra

925 BA NO. 1195 OF 2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 925 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1195 OF 2025 SURAJ LAHU TORKAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Mr. Undre Vikram Shivaji, Advocate for Applicant Mr. P. P. Dawalkar, APP for Respondent/States ....

CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : 24.09.2025 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the State.

2.

When this Court expresses disinclination to allow the application, upon instructions, the learned advocate for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application.

3.

Leave granted. The application is disposed of as withdrawn. 4.

The learned advocate for the applicant prays for direction to expedite the trial.

5.

The trial court is directed to decide the Sessions case as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of one year from today. Needless to mention that the word "Sessions" means that once it is started, it shall not be stopped. It is clarified that if any other Sessions case has been directed to be expedited by this Court or by the

(( 2 )) 925 BA NO. 1195 OF 2025 Hon'ble Supreme Court, such case shall take precedence and be decided first. Thereafter, the trial of the present case shall be taken up for decision. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav