Satish Punjabrao Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 907-CA8565-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8565 OF 2019 IN REJECTED CASE NO. 568 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 32378 OF 2018 Satish S/o Punjabrao Patil .. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents Mr. G. G. Kadam, Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for Respondents-State.

CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ DATED : 26th JULY, 2019.

PER COURT:- 1.

For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer Clause (B) and wrongly mentioned Clause (D) on condition that the applicant removes office objections within a period of three weeks from today.

2.

Civil Application is disposed of. No costs.

( MANGESH S. PATIL ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE P.S.B.