← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/581/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Jayant Bhanudas Dandavate Through Its General Power Of Attorney Holder P M Dandavate And Another v. Pundlik Vitthal Mahajan

2017-10-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre2 pages

wp12893.16, etc.

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.12893 OF 2016 Jayant Bhanudas Dandavate & anr.

..PETITIONERS

VERSUS

Arun Sonu Patil ..RESPONDENT Mr U.S. Malte, Advocate for petitioners;

Mr Mangesh G. Patil, Advocate for respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO.579 OF 2017 Jayant Bhanudas Dandavate & anr.

..PETITIONERS

VERSUS

Pundlik Vitthal Mahajan ..RESPONDENT Mr U.S. Malte, Advocate for petitioners;

Mr Mangesh G. Patil, Advocate for respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO.581 OF 2017 Jayant Bhanudas Dandavate & anr.

..PETITIONERS

VERSUS

Pundlik Vitthal Mahajan ..RESPONDENT Mr U.S. Malte, Advocate for petitioners;

Mr Mangesh G. Patil, Advocate for respondent CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 4th October, 2017 ORAL ORDER:

wp12893.16, etc.

(2) Mr Malte, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, upon instructions, makes a motion for withdrawal of the petitions. Motion accepted. Petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn. 2.

It is made clear that this Court has not examined merits of the matter and the Trial Court shall decide claim in the suit without being influenced by prima facie findings recorded at the time of deciding injunction application.

(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) amj