Babasaheb Navnath Pansare And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Others

(1) 976-wp-8105-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 976 WRIT PETITION NO.8105 OF 2019 BABASAHEB NAVNATH PANSARE AND OTHERS ..PETITIONERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9221 OF 2019 GULAB PATILBA MORE AND OTHERS ..PETITIONERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9755 OF 2019 KASHINATH BHAGAJI GAIKWAD AND OTHERS ..PETITIONERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. Sachin S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioners in WP/8105/2019 and WP/9221/2019. Mr. Ameet R. Vaidya, Advocate for Petitioners in WP/9775/2019.

Mr. P. S. Patil, AGP for Respondents-State.

Mr. Anand V. Indrale Patil, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 5.

...

(2) 976-wp-8105-2019 CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

DATED : 29th AUGUST, 2019.

PER COURT:- 1.

Mr. Patil, learned counsel for Maharashtra Highway Authority and the Competent Authority on instruction makes a statement that petitioners would be heard and their objections would be decided after hearing them afresh.

2.

The learned counsel has placed on record the communication received by him from the Competent Authority. The same is marked as 'X' for identification.

3.

In view of the statement, the grievance of petitioners to the large extent stands redressed. 4.

All contentions of respective parties are kept open.

5.

Writ Petitions disposed of. No costs.

6.

The impugned order certainly would not be an impediment.

(ANIL S. KILOR) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/August-19