Yogesh Narayan Nehete v. The District Collector, Jalgaon And Others

933-CA-7543-2021 & 934

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 933 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7543 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 17697 OF 2021 WITH CA/7544/2021 IN FAST/17809/2021 RUKHMABAI DEVRAM MALI

VERSUS

THE COLLECTOR JALGAON AND OTHERS AND 934 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9754 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 19866 OF 2021 WITH CA/9759/2021 IN FAST/20067/2021 WITH CA/9757/2021 IN FAST/20071/2021 WITH CA/9755/2021 IN FAST/20074/2021 WITH CA/9758/2021 IN FAST/20081/2021 WITH CA/9756/2021 IN FAST/20083/2021 YOGESH NARAYAN NEHETE

VERSUS

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR JALGAON AND OTHERS ...

Mr. Akash Mane h/f. Mr. A.B. Kale - Advocate for respective Applicants Mr. S.N. Kendre and Mr. B.V. Virdhe - AGP's for Respondents, State Mr. S.B. Kadu and Mr. V.P. Narwade Advocate for Respondents ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 21st July, 2023 PER COURT :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of Pooja K.

1/2

933-CA-7543-2021 & 934 delay periods mentioned in these applications, which appear to be caused due to their poor financial condition. 3.

The learned A.G.P. as well as learned Counsel for the respective acquiring bodies, strongly opposed the application on the ground that, no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay periods.

4.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay periods mentioned in these applications stand condoned, subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the periods of aforesaid delay.

5.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

6.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE Pooja K.

2/2