← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1578/2019dismissed

Abhay Yuva Kalyan Kendra Through Its Chairman And Another v. North Maharashtra University Jalgaon Through Registrar And Others

2020-11-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav2 pages

{1} 196 sr.no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1578 OF 2019 WITH WP/5601/2019 ABHAY YUVA KALYAN KENDRA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

NORTH MAHARASHTRA UNIVERSITY JALGAON THROUGH REGISTRAR AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Sachin S. Deshmukh Respondent No.1 Served.

Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Ajay S. Deshpande Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. B. V. Virdhe ...

CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J.

DATE : 6TH NOVEMBER, 2020.

PER COURT:

I do not fnd any substance in both the writ petitions. So far as the Contempt Proceedings are concerned, the College Tribunal has heard both the parties at length and reserved the matters for orders. Though, the petitioners have requested the College Tribunal to keep the Contempt Proceedings in abeyance till disposal of the writ petitions, however, the College Tribunal has not considered the same since the matters are already reserved for orders and informed the petitioners that after Diwali Vacation, orders will be pronounced. It further appears that the petitioners herein, have not challenged the original order passed by the College Tribunal, of which the

{2} 196 sr.no..odt contempt has been alleged. In view of the same, the petitioners are always at liberty to challenge the order passed by the College Tribunal in those Contempt proceedings. However, these petitions are premature.

2] There is no reason for this Court to consider the grounds raised by the petitioners before the College Tribunal when the Tribunal has reserved the orders in said contempt proceedings, by adhering to the grounds raised by the petitioners in the Contempt Proceedings.

3] In view of the above, both the writ petitions are hereby dismissed.

[ V. K. JADHAV ] JUDGE grt/-