The State Of Maharashtra And ANR v. Abhinit Ashok Runme

{1} ca10732-09 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10732 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.20238 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra APPLICANT

VERSUS

Abhinit Ashok Rumne RESPONDENT .......

Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for the applicant - State Mr. V. G. Kodale h/f Mr. V. D. Gunale, for respondent - claimant .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] DATE : 10 th APRIL, 2018 ORDER :

1.

Heard learned advocates for the parties.

2.

Learned AGP refers to the contents of the application and submits that delay has been caused under the circumstances referred to therein. He submits that the delay is neither intentional nor deliberate, nor any benefit has been derived by causing the delay.

3.

Learned advocate for the respondent - claimant purports to resist the application, however, is not in a position to challenge veracity of the contents of the application.

{2} ca10732-09 4.

In the circumstances, having regard to the reasons as are given in the application, the delay is condoned, application is allowed and is disposed of.

[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] drp/ca10732-09