Sushilabai Rajaram Londhe v. Pralhad Tikaram Savandkar And ORS

( 1 ) 927 CA 9291 OF 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 927 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9291 OF 2025 IN SA/617/2012 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 617 OF 2012 SUSHILABAI RAJARAM LONDHE

VERSUS

PRALHAD TIKARAM SAVANDKAR AND ORS ...

• Ms. Pooja A. Patil h/f. Mr. S. P. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for the Applicant ...

CORAM

: SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.

DATE : September 04, 2025 P. C. :- CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9291 OF 2025 1.

The learned Advocate for the applicant states that there is delay of 694 days caused in bringing legal representatives of respondent No.3 and delay of 645 days caused in bringing legal representatives of respondent No.4 on record.

2.

None appears for the respondents.

3.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the civil application

( 2 ) 927 CA 9291 OF 2025 is allowed. The delay is condoned. Names of legal representatives of respondent Nos.3 and 4 be brought on record.

4.

Necessary amendment to that effect be carried out within a period of one week, and thereafter notice be issued to added respondents, returnable on 19.09.2025.

5.

Place the matter on 19.09.2025.

[SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.] PRW