Vijay Vishnu Kale v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

.. 1 ..

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 159 WRIT PETITION NO.8677 OF 2021 VIJAY VISHNU KALE .. Petitioner

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS .. Respondents ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr Irfan D Maniyar AGP for Respondents / State : Mr S.K. Tambe Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 & 3 : Mr S.B. Pulkundwar ...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R.N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATE : 09-08-2021 PER COURT : - 1.

We have heard Mr Maniyar, learned Advocate for the petitioner.

2.

The learned AGP accepts notice for respondent no.1. Mr Pulkundwar, learned Advocate appears for respondents no.2 and 3 and submits that, the petitioner has remedy before the Divisional Commissioner as per the Govt. Resolution dated 15-05-2014. 3.

In view of that, we are not entering into the merits of the Gajanan

.. 2 ..

matter. The Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy. All contentions are kept open. [ R.N. LADDHA ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE Gajanan